Peer Review Process

Kandang  a blind peer review process. Each submission of the manuscript will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, followed by editorial comments. Editor-in-Chief or editor by the field of research will provide a decision of acceptance/rejection.

A. Pre-check manuscript

After submission, this examination was initially to assess the suitability of the text with the scope of the journal template and plagiarism, if the text does not match the template and the similarity number exceeds 15% then the text will be returned to be repaired first.

B. Review by peer colleagues

The process is peer-blind, and peer-reviewed, meaning that the author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. To assist editors, JSPI staff handles all communication with authors, reviewers, and external editors. The editor will check the script status and the identity of the reviewer at any time. Reviewers were given two weeks to write their reviews. To review the revised text, reviewers are asked to provide their report within one week.

C. Editor Decision 

The decision to accept the text, after the peer review, was made by the editor. Editors can choose from: accept, reject, ask the revised author, and request an additional reviewer.

 a blind peer review process. Each submission of the manuscript will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, followed by editorial comments. Editor-in-Chief or editor by the field of research will provide a decision of acceptance/rejection.

Disclaimer

 

The views expressed in published works do not reveal the views of the journal/publisher / Editor / Editorial Staff. The authors have legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the article. The issuer will not have obligations in the event of issuing damage claims. The issuer will not be considered legally responsible if there is a compensation claim.

 

Screening For Plagiarism

Plagiarism is a serious problem and is very easy to avoid. Articles indicated that plagiarism is not permitted to be published in the Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia (JSPI). We use the Plagiarism Checker software for early detection of possible plagiarism. But still, if there are articles found plagiarized later, the right action will be taken following the publisher's guidelines on plagiarism. We will review articles that are suspected/claimed not to be following the publication ethics of JSPI publishers and that article may be withdrawn.

Reviewer Guidelines

Invitation emails with article titles, abstracts, due date reviews, and links to access the partner or reviewer partner dashboard will be sent to a verified email address where reviewers can enter using a user ID and password to accept or reject the review request. If the reviewer or reviewer chooses to accept the review assignment, the review guideline page will open which will contain brief instructions for the reviewer and some links to additional resources for the reviewer. After reading the guide the reviewer can click on the tab "continue to step # 3" which will allow you to download the full text and fill out the review response form. Review the response form which usually contains several questionnaires and text boxes; one to write comments to the author and others to write secret comments to the editor. Reviewers can fill out this response form when ready to provide feedback and choose recommendations from the drop-down list then click the selection button to accept the script, both minor repairs and major improvements. In addition, the reviewer can upload the review report as an attachment file to be submitted to the editor.

 

Publication Charge

Kandang (JKD) publishes all of its articles in the full open-access format. The scientific community and the general public have free, unlimited, and direct access to all content published in JSPI as soon as it is published on the Internet. This means that JKD does not receive revenue from sales of subscriptions to print or view the online version of its journals or from charging "pay per view" frees. Therefore, JKD needs to finance its editorial and production costs by collecting article processing frees (APC) from authors or research funding bodies. The value of JKD (APC) article processing frees for Student writers and for authors of Lecturers and/or Researchers. APC includes editorial services and article production.

Submission to JKD is free of charge. APC is paid when the editor states that the article was accepted to be processed into the next proces.